PURPOSE This research was conducted to identify long-term care service needs in the baby boom generation. METHODS Data were collected from September 3 to October 9, 2012 targeting 196 baby boomers residing in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do with the measurement of long-term care service needs having five domains. Collected data were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 program. RESULTS Demand for long term care service in those who preferred nursing homes was highest as 4.40±0.69 in the safe environment domain. In case of those preferring home care services, demand was highest as 4.37±0.56 in the social interaction domain. People who preferred nursing homes had higher needs in personal health care and improvement of the service quality domains. Those who preferred home care services showed diverse needs according to their characteristics. CONCLUSION The baby boom generation had high needs in all the domains of long-term care services and such needs were diverse according to their characteristics. However, long-term care services had limitations that they provided standardized and uniformed services only. Therefore, health care services and improved quality services should be provided in a way of meeting the users' needs, and tailored services should be provided in consideration of the users' characteristics.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
An Analysis of the Effects of the Income Level of the Family Caregivers for the Recipients in Long-Term Care facilities on the Willingness to Pay for Use of Better Services: A cross-sectional study Jinhee Kwon, Eun-Jeong Han, Hyun Ki Kim Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2023; 25(2): 103. CrossRef
PURPOSE This study examined factors influencing subjective quality of life in baby boom generation men. METHODS This was a descriptive survey study. Data were collected from 279 baby boom generation men from September to October 2012. The instruments used included a subjective quality of lifescale, a self-esteem scale, a spiritual well-being scale, a communication with spouse scale, a social support scale, and a job satisfaction scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA and Scheffe test, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Hierarchical multiple regression. RESULTS All variables were positively correlated with subjective quality of life. As a result, factors influencing subjective life of quality were self-esteem (beta=.21, p<.000), social support (beta=.20, p<.002), job satisfaction (beta=.19, p<.001), communication with spouse (beta=.15, p<.004), spiritual well-being(beta=.16, p<.004), and family income (beta=.15. p<.023). These factors accounted for 61% of the total variances. CONCLUSION The findings indicate a need to develop nursing intervention programs for community health nurses in consideration of these variables to improve the subjective quality of life for baby boom generation men.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Factors Related to the Life Satisfaction of Elderly Baby Boomers: An Analysis of the 2020 Korean National Survey of Elderly Soo-Ji Jin, Yeon-Hwan Park Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2023; 35(2): 184. CrossRef
Risk of suicide death in psychiatric patients according to the level of continuity of care and area deprivation: A population-based nested case-control study Doo Woong Lee, San Lee, Sarah Soyeon Oh, Hin Moi Youn, Dong-Woo Choi, Sun Jae Jung, Sung-In Jang, Eun-Cheol Park Journal of Psychiatric Research.2022; 151: 279. CrossRef
The Effect of Family Support, Social Support and Workplace Spirituality of Quality of Life on Middle Aged-male Young-sook Seo, Chu-young Jeong Journal of Korean Clinical Health Science.2016; 4(4): 782. CrossRef
Attitude Styles toward Holistic Health in Male Baby Boomers using Q-methodology Hyun-Ok Jung, Eun-Jeong Shin, Kyung-Ran Park, Kwang-Za Yu, Hee-Sook Kim Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2016; 28(5): 501. CrossRef
Health-related Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors according to Gender in Baby Boomers Min-Jeong Park, E. Eunyoung Suh, Mi Young Chung Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2015; 27(3): 314. CrossRef