PURPOSE This study aimed to verify the predictive validity of Comprehensive Korean Frailty Instrument (CKFI) among older adults. METHODS A secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study was conducted. Frailty was determined in older adults (N=9,188) according to the data in 2008 and the effects of frailty on adverse outcomes (such as institutionalization and death) were evaluated according to the data in 2011. The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) index was used to compare with the predictive validity of CKFI. RESULTS The prevalence of frailty was 26.3%. With the CKFI, the frail group had a higher risk of negative health outcomes compared to the robust and pre-frail groups after three years. The two of the highest risks identified using the CKFI and CHS index were institutionalization (5.522 times higher) and mortality (3.210 times higher). For both instruments, the survival analysis revealed that the risk of death increased as the degree of frailty increased. CONCLUSION The CKFI consisting of self-report items and multidimensional aspects of frailty can be used as a simple instrument for assessing the frailty of older adults residing in a local community in Korea.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Modifiable Factors Associated with Physical Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Trajectory of Older Adults: Using the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging 2006–2018 Sumi Lee Healthcare.2025; 13(3): 315. CrossRef
Frailty assessment using routine clinical data: An integrative review Arum Lim, JiYeon Choi, Hyunju Ji, Hyangkyu Lee Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics.2022; 99: 104612. CrossRef
Impact of Frailty, Depression, and Loneliness on Ego-Integrity in Community-Dwelling Elderly Seon Ju Song, Sung Hee Ko, Ji Young Kim, Hyun Kyung Kim STRESS.2022; 30(3): 139. CrossRef
Factors associated with frailty among community-dwelling older adults by age group: A multi-dimensional approach Lee Seyune, Kim Hongsoo, Jung Young-il, Hong Yun-chul Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion.2018; 35(2): 89. CrossRef