, Mi Young Kim2
1Master’s student, College of Nursing, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
2Professor, College of Nursing, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
Copyright © 2025 Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0) which allows readers to disseminate and reuse the article, as well as share and reuse the scientific material. It does not permit the creation of derivative works without specific permission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea (Grant No. RS-2023-KH141157).
Authors’ contributions
Yoo Jin Sim contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, visualization, writing - original draft, review & editing, investigation, resources, and software. Mi Young Kim contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, writing - original draft, review & editing, investigation, resouces, software, supervision and validation.
Data availability
Access to the data is restricted, and data are available in accordance with the data-sharing policy of the funding institution.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all individuals who contributed to the successful completion of this research. We are especially grateful to the Principal Investigator, Yong Soon Shin, for her continuous support and guidance throughout the research process. We also extend our thanks to the Hanyang Care Robot Research Team, including So-Seul Park, Sang-Hee Jung, and Lijun Yang, for their valuable assistance in facilitating the progress of this study.
| Variables | Category | Exp. (n=25) | Cont. (n=25) | x2/t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) or M±SD | |||||
| Age (years) | Total | 32.62±6.80 | |||
| 24-29 | 8 (32.0) | 11 (44.0) | 2.80 | .423 | |
| 30-39 | 12 (48.0) | 11 (44.0) | |||
| 40-49 | 5 (20.0) | 2 (8.0) | |||
| ≥50 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) | |||
| Gender | Female | 24 (96.0) | 25 (100.0) | 0.00 | >.999† |
| Male | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Clinical experience (years) | Total | 8.50±5.97 | |||
| < 1 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) | 4.09 | .394 | |
| Less than 1-3 | 1 (4.0) | 4 (16.0) | |||
| Less than 3-7 | 9 (36.0) | 5 (20.0) | |||
| Less than 7-12 | 9 (36.0) | 10 (40.0) | |||
| ≥12 | 6 (24.0) | 5 (20.0) | |||
| Care Robot Usage Experience | Yes | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.0) | 0.00 | >.999† |
| No | 23 (92.0) | 23 (92.0) | |||
| Care Robot Education Experience | Yes | 1 (4.0) | 2 (8.0) | 0.00 | >.999† |
| No | 24 (96.0) | 23 (92.0) | |||
| Knowledge | |||||
| Knowledge of Excretion Care and Excretion Care Robots | 5.64±1.44 | 5.40±1.44 | -0.59 | .559 | |
| Attitudes | |||||
| Self-efficacy in Excretion Care | 15.96±3.79 | 17.12±2.91 | 1.21 | .231 | |
| Self-efficacy in using the Excretion Care Robot | 8.00±1.19 | 8.20±1.38 | 0.55 | .586 | |
| Perceived usefulness of the Excretion Care Robot | 12.60±1.58 | 12.76±1.81 | 0.33 | .741 | |
| Perceived ease of use of the Excretion Care Robot | 6.76±1.27 | 6.84±1.41 | 0.21 | .833 | |
| Anxiety about the Excretion Care Robot | 5.24±1.33 | 5.20±2.00 | -0.08 | .934 | |
| Behavioral intention to use the Excretion Care Robot | 10.84±2.30 | 10.88±2.60 | 0.06 | .954 | |
| Category | Content | Method | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asynchronous Pre-Learning | Watching educational videos on classification, functions, installation/removal, maintenance, precautions, and FAQs about excretion care robots | Online video learning: 7 clips, approximately 3 minutes each | Participants freely watch the videos over about one week (at least once, no limit) |
| In-Person Didactic Session | Theoretical education on excretion care and excretion care robots | Face-to-face theoretical instruction with explanations, examples, and short quizzes | 1 hour |
| In-Person Hands-on Session | Demonstration and hands-on training using mannequins; experiencing installation, operation, and parts of the excretion care robot | Face-to-face practical training involving direct manipulation of components and functions | 2 hours |
| Variables | Category | Exp. (n=25) | Cont. (n=25) | x2/t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) or M±SD | |||||
| Age (years) | Total | 32.62±6.80 | |||
| 24-29 | 8 (32.0) | 11 (44.0) | 2.80 | .423 | |
| 30-39 | 12 (48.0) | 11 (44.0) | |||
| 40-49 | 5 (20.0) | 2 (8.0) | |||
| ≥50 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) | |||
| Gender | Female | 24 (96.0) | 25 (100.0) | 0.00 | >.999 |
| Male | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Clinical experience (years) | Total | 8.50±5.97 | |||
| < 1 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) | 4.09 | .394 | |
| Less than 1-3 | 1 (4.0) | 4 (16.0) | |||
| Less than 3-7 | 9 (36.0) | 5 (20.0) | |||
| Less than 7-12 | 9 (36.0) | 10 (40.0) | |||
| ≥12 | 6 (24.0) | 5 (20.0) | |||
| Care Robot Usage Experience | Yes | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.0) | 0.00 | >.999 |
| No | 23 (92.0) | 23 (92.0) | |||
| Care Robot Education Experience | Yes | 1 (4.0) | 2 (8.0) | 0.00 | >.999 |
| No | 24 (96.0) | 23 (92.0) | |||
| Knowledge | |||||
| Knowledge of Excretion Care and Excretion Care Robots | 5.64±1.44 | 5.40±1.44 | -0.59 | .559 | |
| Attitudes | |||||
| Self-efficacy in Excretion Care | 15.96±3.79 | 17.12±2.91 | 1.21 | .231 | |
| Self-efficacy in using the Excretion Care Robot | 8.00±1.19 | 8.20±1.38 | 0.55 | .586 | |
| Perceived usefulness of the Excretion Care Robot | 12.60±1.58 | 12.76±1.81 | 0.33 | .741 | |
| Perceived ease of use of the Excretion Care Robot | 6.76±1.27 | 6.84±1.41 | 0.21 | .833 | |
| Anxiety about the Excretion Care Robot | 5.24±1.33 | 5.20±2.00 | -0.08 | .934 | |
| Behavioral intention to use the Excretion Care Robot | 10.84±2.30 | 10.88±2.60 | 0.06 | .954 | |
| Variable | Exp. (n=25) | Cont. (n=25) | t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M±SD | |||||
| Knowledge | Knowledge of Excretion Care and Excretion Care Robots | 7.76±0.52 | 5.12±1.59 | -7.89 | <.001 |
| Attitudes | Self-efficacy in Excretion Care | 20.48±4.23 | 16.68±3.81 | -3.34 | .002 |
| Self-efficacy in using the Excretion Care Robot | 9.28±0.98 | 8.48±1.45 | -2.29 | .027 | |
| Perceived usefulness of the Excretion Care Robot | 13.80±1.41 | 12.36±2.50 | -2.51 | .016 | |
| Perceived ease of use of the Excretion Care Robot | 9.08±1.04 | 7.36±1.85 | -4.06 | <.001 | |
| Anxiety about the Excretion Care Robot | 3.44±1.33 | 5.24±1.67 | 4.23 | <.001 | |
| Behavioral intention to use the Excretion Care Robot | 12.72±2.15 | 10.48±2.95 | -3.07 | .004 | |
| Skills | Proficiency | 7.84±1.18 | 4.40±1.98 | -7.47 | <.001 |
| Accuracy of the Execution Procedure | 15.24±1.39 | 9.16±2.59 | -10.33 | <.001 | |
| Accuracy of the Performance Outcome | 9.16±0.99 | 4.44±1.98 | -10.67 | <.001 | |
| Satisfaction | Total | 47.44±3.45 | |||
| 1. knowledge improvement | 4.56±0.58 | ||||
| 2. practical skill improvement | 4.68±0.48 | ||||
| 3. Level of educational difficulty | 4.84±0.37 | ||||
| 4. Content of the theoretical lecture | 4.76±0.52 | ||||
| 5. Duration of the theoretical lecture | 4.84±0.37 | ||||
| 6. Content of the practical training | 4.88±0.33 | ||||
| 7. Duration of the practical training | 4.80±0.41 | ||||
| 8. Helpfulness in learning to use other care robots | 4.68±0.48 | ||||
| 9. Increased interest and curiosity about care robots | 4.80±0.41 | ||||
| 10. Helpfulness for personal development | 4.60±0.58 | ||||
Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; Fisher’s exact test
Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group