The Effects of a School Safety Education Program Based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model in Upper Grade Elementary Students

Article information

Res Community Public Health Nurs. 2010;21(4):419-428
Publication date (electronic) : 2014 April 04
doi : https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.4.419
1Professor, Department of Nursing, Kemyung University, Korea.
2School Health Teacher, Taejeon Elementary School, Korea.
Address reprint requests to: Lee, En Young, Department of Taejeon Elementary School Taejeon, Gongwon 4 gil, 12 Taejeon-dong, buk-gu, Daegu 702-261, Korea. Tel: 82-53-321-4164, Fax: 82-53-321-4165, kdglee@hanmail.net
Received 2010 September 03; Revised 2010 December 01; Accepted 2010 December 02.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of a school safety education program based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model for upper grade elementary students.

Methods

One hundred ten 6th-grade students sampled from an elementary school in D City were divided into the education group (n=55) and the non-education group (n=55). School safety education was provided to the education group for 8 weeks and a questionnaire survey about safety knowledge, safety practice and the frequency of safety negligence was carried out before and after the education from March 2 to July 13, 2010.

Results

After the application of the safety education program, the education group got a higher safety knowledge score than the non-education group (p<.001). Both the education and non-education groups showed a significantly increased safety practice score (p<.01). In the comparison of safety negligence, the education group showed lower frequency (p<.01). In addition, according to the results of ANCOVA and t-test, the school safety education program influenced safety knowledge significantly (p<.001).

Conclusion

This result shows that a school safety education program based on PRECEDE-PROCEED can improve safety knowledge. Further studies will be required to develop continuous and systematic safety education programs.

Notes

This work was supported by the Kemyung University Dongsan Medical Center Research Grant of 2007.

References

1. Back KW, Lee MS. A diagnostic study of safety education in elementary schools based on PRECEDE model. Health Educ Promot 2001;18(1):35–47.
2. Choi JH. The survey of child accident Seoul: Korean Consumer Agency; 2009.
3. Chun CO. The study of school negliance in elimentary school Chungwon: Korea National University of Education; 1997. Unpublished master's thesis.
4. Green LW, Kreuter MW, Deeds SG, Patridge KB. Health education planning: A diagnostic approach California: Mountain View; 1980.
5. Guyer B, Gallagher SS, Chang BH, Azzara CV, Cupple LA, Colton T. Prevention of child injuries: Evaluation of the statewide childhood injury prevention program (SCIPP). Am J Public Health 1989;79(11):1521–1527.
6. Hayes DM, Fors SW. Self-esteem and health instruction: Challenge for curriculumn development. J Sch Health 1990;60(5):208–211.
7. Huh SK, Jang SK, Noh BS. The practice of industrial safety Seoul: Hakmoon Company; 2002.
8. Jun ST. A study on the safety education of elementary school Kyungnam: Kyungnam University; 1998. Unpublished master's thesis.
9. Jung MA. The effect of safety education on safety knowledge and behavior among elementary school student Taegu: Kyungpook National University; 2004. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
10. Kim JU, Park BS, Kim KC, Suh JY, Yi SH, Park CW, et al. Physical education Seoul: Kyohak Publishing; 2010.
11. Kim SH. A prediction model of health promotion behavior for school children Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2007. Unpublished doctorial dissertation.
12. Korea Consumer Agency. The survey of safety negligent to educational institution 2009. Retrieved May 8, 2009. from http://www.kca.go.kr.
13. Kwang HS. A study on the pedestrian safety education for elementary school children. J Korean Soc Health Educ 1993;10(1):61–71.
14. Kwon SH. Development and effect of safety education program for higher grade students of elementary school Seoul: Yonsei University; 2005. Unpublished master's thesis.
15. Lee EY. The effect of safety education on safety knowledge and behavior among elementary school student Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2001. Unpublished master's thesis.
16. Lee KY. The effect of theoretical and practical reinforced instruction of traffic safety on elementary student's traffic safety rule behavior Jeonju: Chonbuk National University; 2005. Unpublished master's thesis.
17. Loescher LJ, Taylor A, Christensen DH, Mckinney M. Educating preschoolers about sun safety. Am J Public Health 1995;85(7):939–943.
18. Ministry of Education, Science, Technology Official Announcement. Repaired curriculum in the health education 2008. 09. 12. Retrieved September 12, 2008. from http://www.mest.go.kr.
19. Newsis. The frequency of school negligency & pay a bounty during past 3 years 2010. 09. 26. Retrieved September 26, 2010. from http://www.newsis.com/ar_detail/view.html?ar_id=NISX20100926_0006259509&cID=10201&pID=10200.
20. Renaud L, Suissa S. Evaluation of the efficacy of simulation games in traffic safety education of kindergarten children. Am J Public Health 1989;79(3):307–309.
21. Sim MY, No HY, Cho SS, Cho YJ, Choi MS, Shin HJ, et al. Health Daegu: Sukyung Publishing; 2009.
22. Son JH. The study on the effectiveness of participatory road traffic safety education for the elementary school student in Korea Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2006. Unpublished master's thesis.
23. Statistics Korea. 2007 Social survey in education, safety, environment 2008. Retrieved October 21, 2008. from http://kostat.go.kr/wnsearchNew/search.jsp.
24. Yoon SY, Lee KS, Lee HJ, Shin YM, Kim CM, Choi JM. Health promotion Seoul: Soomoon Publishing; 2000.

Article information Continued

Funded by : Kemyung University Dongsan Medical Center Research Grant of 2007

Figure 1

Research design.

Figure 2

The model of research tools.

Figure 3

The frequency of negligent accident in school.

Table 1

General Characteristics between Experimental Group and Control Group (N=110)

Table 1

p<.01.

Table 2

Safety Related Factors between Experimental Group and Control Group

Table 2

Exp.=experiment group; Cont.=control group.

Table 3

Comparison of Safety Knowledge & Safety Practice between Experimental and Control Groups after Safety Education

Table 3

Exp.=experiment group; Cont.=control group.

Table 4

The Frequency of Negligent Accident Later 3 Month

Table 4

Table 5

The Effect of Safety Education Analysis by ANCOVA

Table 5