Table 1Socioeconomic and Health Characteristics of Rural Community Dwelling Elderly (N=419)
Variables |
Categories |
n (%) or M±SD |
Age (year) |
|
76.25±6.77 |
65~74 |
187 (44.6) |
75~84 |
183 (43.7) |
≥85 |
49 (11.7) |
Gender (female) |
|
340 (81.1) |
Marital status (living alone) |
|
238 (56.8) |
Education |
≤Elementary school |
387 (92.4) |
Middle school |
18 (4.3) |
≥High school |
14 (3.3) |
Job (yes) |
|
123 (29.4) |
Number of chronic disease |
|
1.53±1.04 |
Frailty score |
|
2.53±1.61 |
Robust |
209 (49.9) |
Pre-frail |
162 (38.7) |
Frail |
48 (11.5) |
Fall related efficacy |
|
103.64±41.02 |
Social support |
|
4.97±1.87 |
Quality of life |
|
0.81±0.12 |
Table 2Correlations between Frailty Score, Fall related Efficacy, and Social Support of Rural Community Dwelling Elderly (N=419)
Variables |
Frailty score |
Fall related efficacy |
Social support |
Health related quality of life |
Frailty score |
1 |
|
|
|
Fall related efficacy |
−.42***
|
1 |
|
|
Social support |
−.08*
|
0.06 |
1 |
|
Health related quality of life |
−.46***
|
.54***
|
.13**
|
1 |
Table 3Multiple Regression for Fall related Efficacy and Social Support of Rural Community Dwelling Elderly (N=419)
Variables |
Frailty → Fall related efficacy |
Frailty → Social support |
β†
|
β†
|
Frailty score |
−.35***
|
−.10*
|
Adjusted R2
|
.30 |
.01 |
Table 4Multiple Regression for HRQoL of Rural Community Dwelling Elderly (N=419)
Variables |
Frailty→HRQoL |
Fall related efficacy, Social support→HRQoL |
Mediating effect |
Moderating effect |
Model 1 β†
|
Model 2 β†
|
Model 3 β†
|
Model 4 β†
|
Model 5 β†
|
Model 6 β†
|
Model 7 β†
|
Fraily score |
−.44***
|
|
|
−.29***
|
−.43***
|
−.29***
|
−.43***
|
Fall related efficacy |
|
.52***
|
|
.41*** |
|
.41***
|
|
Social support |
|
|
.13**
|
|
.10* |
|
.09* |
Frail × Fall related efficacy |
|
|
|
|
|
−.02 |
|
Frail × Social support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.04 |
Sobel test (Z) |
|
|
|
−8.34***
|
−1.95 |
|
|
Adjusted R2
|
.20 |
.27 |
.07 |
.34 |
.23 |
.34 |
.23 |